Sunday, March 27, 2011

Philosophy Critique 4: Hayles' My Mother Was a Computer

This article critique will examine the prologue, Computing Kin, in Katherine Hayles book, My Mother Was a Computer: Digital Subjects and Literary Texts.  In her prologue, Hayles argues that there are multiple interpretations of posthumanism and that in the views of posthumanism there is no longer a connection between the view of the disembodied self and the the idea of embodiment associated with new materialism.  The idea of the disembodied self refers to the mind body Cartesian dualism where the body is regarded as a container for the mind.  This is being challenged by the idea of embodiment attributed to post humanism that asserts that we think with the objects that are in our environment (distributed cognition) and thus as humans we cannot exist without material aspects.  Hayles defines materiality as, “an emergent property created through dynamic interactions between physical characteristics and signifying strategies.  Materiality thus marks a junction between physical reality and human intention.”(Hayles, 3).  In other words, her definition of materiality includes physical matter and forces but also the human social and cultural practices influenced by material.  She uses the example of the industrial revolution to show how material (fossil fuels) have caused the evolution of a society and created a society that is dependent upon that material.  This too shows that the nonhuman world is affected by human behavior.  Our class has also identified the virtual Internet as materiality because it too is comprised of physical matter (electricity, cables, computers).  Therefore, in utilizing this idea of embodiment and materiality as aspects of posthumanism, Hayles argues that we have began to change the ways in which we think about ourselves and how we describe ourselves.

She supports her argument by using metaphors of kinship ties.  For example, the title of her book, My Mother Was a Computer can have multiple significations.  Firstly, it can have the meaning that it did in the 1930s and 1940s - that of her mother's actual occupation -  a clerical laborer that performs calculations. Today, the computer is seen as a machine that provides information and does calculations. This, "...mark[s] a shift from a society in which the intelligence required for calculations was primarily associated with humans to increasing delegation of these labors to computational machines.” (Hayles, 1).  For example, many white-collar data collecting jobs have been replaced by computers.  This reliance on computers has changed our relationships and Hayles uses the metaphor of the mother to illustrate this change.  She says, “Just as mother nature was seen in the past centuries as the source of both human behavior and physical reality, so now the Universal Computer is envisioned as the Motherboard of us all.” (Hayles, 3).  The computer has taken on the role of the mother and educator.  Using literacy as an example, children once learned how to read by listening to their mothers' voices telling stories and sounding out words themselves.  Today, literacy and reading instruction have been replaced by digital stimuli in the forms of e-mails, instant messaging, and blogging with the mother's voice replaced by the pings and beeps that indicate a new message.  Furthermore, the computer has taken the role of the mother in giving sound advice.  Users can search message boards and websites on the internet for advice on everything from relationships, to health, to cooking, etc.  Hayles argues that blurring the definition of the computer's actual operation and attributing human-like characteristics to the machine, "...creates a cultural Imagery in which digital subjects are understood as autonomous creatures imbued with human-like motives, goals, and strategies.” (Hayles, 5).  We have imposed anthropomorphic qualities to the computer because we use it to regulate our lives and manage the complexity to reach our goal and without the computer the complexity theory would not have been formed.

To define the complexity that the computer copes with for us, Hayles argues that we need narrative explanations rather than mathematical calculations that can only explain simulations and the physical laws of the world.   She feels that narratives are more beneficial to explain complexity and self-organized systems - like the Internet - because stories and narratives are the oldest forms of knowledge that date back to human existence and as a result, easier to understand.  She also explains how there are dynamics between narratives and simulations that dispute the previous dualistic notions and show how complexity overcomes these dualisms to promote interaction.  For instance, she shows how the dualisms of language and code, print and electronic text, and analog and digital have co-evolved to interact, "Together, these three dynamics can be parsed as making (language and code), storing (print and electronic text), and transmitting (analog and digital). (Hayles, 6-7).  Thus, this issue is important because it shows that there are other ways to think about posthumanism that are not negative and that the complexity attributed a posthuman world can help breakdown the dualisms showing interaction and changing the way we think about humans and nonhumans.

I am convinced by Hales argument that there is no longer a binary between the disembodied self and the embodied self because it is true that we cannot exist without certain material aspects and we have become dependent on these aspects.  I also agree with her definition of materiality that includes nonhuman forces because they too can affect our everyday lives,we can control and manipulate some but other self-organizing forces are out of our control and can have repercussions on our everyday lives.  I do not agree with Hales idea that computer metaphors are surpassing mechanical metaphors to describe the body.  Many of today's institutions still heavily rely on the body as a machine metaphor.  For instance, the health care system constantly sees the body as a malfunctioning or broken down machine that needs medical intervention to fix certain parts and make the whole work better.  Thus, my question would be what kind of stories/metaphors would you use to describe the posthuman world?  Mechanical?  Computer? or any other metaphor?  and do you see the posthuman world as a positive or negative change?

Teaching aids:

A piece on body metaphors

A nice short article on the fundamentals of posthumanism

 


 

Saturday, March 5, 2011

Philosophy Critique 3: Westlake's Friend Me if You Facebook

I thoroughly enjoyed reading E.J. Westlake's article this week, Friend Me if You Facebook Generation Y and Performative Surveillance.  As an avid Facebook user, I thought her panoptic and biopolitical analysis of the social networking website was quite accurate in developing her argument.  She argues that performances of identities are in continuous development and that through the restrictive Facebook interface and self-policing they reproduce social norms while at the same time, blur the boundaries of normative categories.  Westlake's idea of performance is, all the activity of an individual which occurs during a period marked by his continuous presence before a particular set of observers and which has some influence on the observers.” (Westlake, 26).  Facebook today, is a global network that allows for a wider audience and in turn, encourages mass exhibitionism to users with hundreds or even thousands of Facebook 'friends'.


The mass exhibitionism permitted by Facebook blurs multiple normative oppositions, creating tensions of conceptualized boundaries.  Westlake contends, “Facebook…allow[s] people to share information online the same way they do in the real world.  This tension between specificity and generality, and local and global, affects the ways in which communities of users perform their identities.” (Westlake, 23).  For instance, many students enjoying using Facebook to meet new classmates and learn more about their peers from the information that they have posted on their profiles.  However, they feel uncomfortable and stalked when others do the same and know about them through Facebook.  (Westlake, 33).  This creates a conflict for the user and the specificity and generality of the information they post.  If they are too general, they are not able to fully perform their identities and are not fulfilled through the Facebook experience.  However, if they are too specific they risk divulging too much information to those they do not know inside and outside of their locality, making them ill at ease when being recognized for Facebook content.  This uncomfortable feeling is also attributed to the reason why users post information that conforms to normative categories.  Facebook is a site that encourages self-policing as well as the policing of others with their 'report' feature.  The report feature gives other users the ability to aid in the removal of inappropriate content.  Not only do other users but corporations, the government, and employers access information on Facebook, altering the ways in which users perform their identities.  Thus, because of all these forms of surveillance I agree with Westlake's claim that Facebook is used more for perpetuating real-world normative behaviour than it is for expressing deviant behaviour (Westlake, 35).  She notes that, "...an overwhelming majority of users do not exaggerate or highlight so-called deviant behavior...most information users present in online profiles depicts the lives of the actual users doing relatively mundane activities." (Westlake, 32).  Thus, with surveillance from the government, companies, and other users, one never knows who is in the Panoptic tower and in consequence, has to perform their identity in a way that has all agents affirm their identity and thee easiest way to facilitate cooperation between all agents is to comply with societal norms.  

Societal norms are further reinforced through the restrictive interface of the Facebook profile information page.  While religion and political identities are openly constructed, gender is limited to the normative constraints of male and female, sexual preference is limited to male and female, relationship statues exclude polygamous relationships, and family relations deny adoptive ties and relationships with step parents/siblings.  These limitations affect the validity of performed identities while maintaining norms opposed to societal progress of acceptance.   Facebook too creates its own norms which mirrors society's ideas of acceptance.  Once is criticized for having too many or too little friends and viewable feedback from one's Facebook friends is considered a sign of acceptance.  In addition to having friends and maintaining constant communication with them, a Facebook user is expected to constantly update their personal information by frequently changing their status updates, profile pictures, and making posts.  This shows how identities on Facebook are not static, they "...resist being fixed as rigid, unchanging subjects." (Westlake, 23).   Continual changes and enhancement in the performance of one's identity and exercise of biopower are permitted through,"mini-applications within the Facebook...[that] enhances users' agency by allowing them to modify content and create an even greater volume of traffic...and 'staged' elements such as font, photographs, music, and graphics." (Westlake, 26-27).  These technologic modifications biopolitically empower the individual to uniquely create themselves in ways different or similar to their real world identities, all while contributing to capitalism as they willingly divulge preferences and dislikes to the corporations that access their profile.

Westlake's argument is important because it identifies the tension between surveillance and performance.  It is obvious through the article that on a large scale generation Yers do not mind being surveyed as millions disclose personal information to Facebook.  However, the article is also important in showing that where there is power there is resistance.  Users can create  fake Facebook profiles to destabilize identity performances and blur the boundaries of what is considered a normative identity.  Furthermore, resistance to power is shown through generation Y's use of Facebook groups to become more politically engaged and actively participate in real world power struggles.  I am still confused with the importance of Facebook in regards to social interactions.  While the article is clear in demonstrating that users of Facebook and multiple forms of communication have more face-to-face interaction, they do not indicate the effects Facebook has on face-to-face interaction.  Instead, Westlake simply states, "...the rules of online communication will begin to compete with and perhaps dominate those of face-to-face social interactions." (Westlake, 30).  Maybe it is too early to see these effects?  

In dealing with this confusion I will pose the question: "In what ways has Facebook altered face-to-face social interactions?"  One example Westlake identifies is the use of the word Facebook as a noun and verb.  I would argue that other Facebook 'terminology' has changed face-to-face social interactions with many people saying the internet short forms of words such as "brb, lol, and g2g".

Supplementary Teaching Aids:

As discussed, Facebook has partnerships with many companies and governments.  Now they may be partnering up with Skype:

A Facebook group that shows you how many hours you have spent on Facebook:
 -I've spent 26 hours on facebook...not sure how reliable it is, I thought it would have been more

A website devoted to Facebook, featuring an article on the rise in time spent on Facebook:

A youtube video interpretation of Facebook if its activities were acted out in the real world:

Sunday, February 13, 2011

Philosophy Critique 2: David Lyon's World Wide Web of Surveillance

"...power is now bound up with an extensive, increasingly integrated, surveillance technology." (Lyon, 92)

David Lyon's article The World Wide Web of Surveillance The Internet and off-world power-flows,  Lyon argues through disciplinary and biopower frameworks how Internet surveillance has become a tool for risk management scenarios and has affected the ways in which we create and modify our ever-changing subjectivities.  He feels that the purpose of online surveillance is to extend power so far that it becomes unnecessary to have actual contact with people.  Rather, the effects of this all encompassing power throughout the Internet and embedded in its codes, create individuals who police themselves.   They produce themselves as specific kinds of people who willingly provide information in constructing their particular subjectivities so that they can be organized, classified, and monitored for prediction purposes.  This is what Lyon refers to as the 'superpanopticon'.  Online surveillance is invisible and like Focault's panopticon, one never knows who exactly is in the guard tower or in this case, what online institutions are following our internet activity. 

To support his ideas Lyon uses three examples of institutions that use online surveillance to manage risks and allow for predictions so that efficiency can flourish.  Firstly, he discusses how employers use online surveillance to monitor employees use of company resources. In citing a US survey of managers he found that, "22 per cent had searched employees' computer files, voice-mail, e-mail and other electronic communications." (Lyon, 96).  Seeing as this is an outdated article, it would be wise to assume that this figure has risen.  Employers want to reduce wasted company resources, time and money so that they are more productive, efficient and thus obtain a greater profit.  Police institutions use online surveillance in a similar fashion to increase their efficiency in catching criminals and reduce crime.  This was exemplified when the FBI undertook 'Operation Innocent', to find paedophiles from the interception of AOL account e-mails.  Lastly, Lyon showed how companies use customer surveillance in the form of data collection by, "collecting, storing, and manipulating information about [consumers] in order to control their behaviors...clustering consumers by social type and location...trying to personalize advertising." (Lyon, 94).  Like the police profile and check records of criminals, companies profile and check the records of their potential customers by looking at their cookies to see past websites visited (the consumers interests), the type of computer they are using (a sign of wealth), and their e-mail address (to send them information regarding their product or service).  This represents a shift away from the physical assessment that was once necessary to draw conclusions on a potential customer's social status and interests to an assessment of their records "compiled in varying situations by diverse professionals and specialists." (Lyon, 100).  This shift has created an invisibility cloak render the individual ignorant of being surveyed and unable to escape it because as Lyon mentioned it starts from the moment we are born with birth certificates followed by driver's licenses, marriage and death certificates. 


This issue has many important implications and potential consequences.  These new forms of surveillance have made it virtually impossible for one to live 'off the grid' and stay unnoticed, even when they have good reasons in doing so.  Thus, many people feel that their privacy is being invaded through online surveillance techniques.  Furthermore, the secretive method of data collection companies use online, has turned the individual into a mere piece of data plunked into the machine of capitalism in hopes to increase profits.  This in turn, works to support the social hierarchy because for companies the categorizing and organizing of individuals is often on a social status scale.  As Lyon puts it on page 102, “Existing inequalities of power and access are reinforced, and, for those who are aware of their digital transparency, fears of being held in an unseen gaze are unrelieved.” 

I am still unclear and bit confused about the process of using search engines to find relevant data and how spiders work.  Thus, i will use my first question in hopes of better understanding this.  What are the consequences of only large corporations being able to afford techniques like data mining?  Another question to promote discussion is, how far do you think is too far?  What should companies and institutions be limited to in their virtual inspection of individuals?

As an aspiring teacher I found Lyon's argument very informative and convincing.  I am much more conscious of my digital footprint and what potential students will see when they run a search and one can never be too careful when using the resources of an employer.  As for his argument, I am not convinced that his representation of the Internet is more reflective of a panoptic or biopower framework, but rather a mélange of the two.  Listed below are supplementary teaching aids and further information on the idea of web surveillance.

Obama's plans for Internet Surveillance:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBq8CGwDuxM
 
Wikipedia's take on computer surveillance
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_surveillance


Online surveillance re: Canada and other countries
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/06/19/f-internet-cellphone-wiretap-surveillance-law.html

How to get your hands on some web surveillance software, how it is advertised and its features:
http://www.webwatchernow.com/monitoring-software/consumer/rh-keylogger.html?gclid=COKClLrAhqcCFYQUKgodlnsjeg

An article on the surveillance of Skype messages in China
pdf
http://msl1.mit.edu/furdlog/docs/nytimes/2008-10-01_nytimes_china_skype_surveillance.pdf

Html
http://74.125.155.132/scholar?q=cache:1N7P-a0xA4sJ:scholar.google.com/+web+surveillance&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5

To fellow classmates:

I have had a lot problems posting my comments to others and my own blogs and learned the hard way to copy the comment before submitting in the event of erasure.  After trying multiple windows and mac computers, the only way I have been able to comment is by using my iPhone.  If any of you have a comment that you wish to post but are unable to, feel free to e-mail it to me at aevanals@lakeheadu.ca and I will post it for you to make sure your work does not go unaccounted for. 

Sunday, January 30, 2011

Philosophy Critique of Guy Debord’s Society of the Spectacle, Part 1: Separation Perfected


In Guy Debord’s Society of the Spectacle, he argues that life is no longer lived but rather experienced from a distance as a spectacle, which he defines as, “the production of present day society.” (Debord, 15).  The spectacle is a representation and a generator of social reality that places a strong importance on appearances…especially appearances through commodities.  In the sense, our society no longer produces commodities; it reproduces the spectacle because it is in the appearance of the commodity that the individual acquires immediate prestige.  Debord describes this process as, “the degradation of being into having…[which] leads to a generalized sliding of having into appearing” (Debord, 17).  Thus, the relationships between commodities become so important that society becomes dominated by the economy in order to gain prestige through a commodity’s appearance, which is the spectacle.  Furthermore, from a Marxist perspective, Guy argues that people forget that human labour goes into commodities and this creates an alienation and isolation from the individual and the product and depreciates human interaction.  Also, when we look at commodities as appearances the commodity becomes a fetish and therefore its production has a mastery over the passive consumer enveloped in the spectacle.  



The passivity of consumers is exemplified through the power relations in the economy, communications, and media.  He says, “[the spectacle] is the diplomatic representation of hierarchic society to itself, where all other expression is banned.” (Debord, 23).  Only a small ruling class of society, which owns the media, has influence on the spectacle.  This communication to the consumer is uni-linear and the consumer is passive in accepting the superficial perfection suggested by the spectacle.  The consumer further perpetuates the spectacle in their everyday life through the commodities they own that alienate and socially isolate them; such as cars and television.  Leisure time has become obsolete, as it is a labour to buy these cultural products (cars, designer jeans, smart phones) and contribute to capitalism.  Even social relations have become commodified and materialistic as people relate to one another through mass-produced cars, movies, music, and television shows. 

Debord’s arguments in Separation Perfected are important because he promotes the awareness of the mystification of the spectacle, in which the spectacle masks the capitalist degradation of reality. However, he feels that potential revolutions in protest would be absorbed by the spectacle.  As an influential figure in the situationist movement, Debord and other situationists saw art as a means of resistance to the spectacle, using an artistic shift to transform and generate situations.  Situationist art uses images produced by the popular culture and turns them against themselves, or rather the spectacle.  A popular form of expression of situationist art is graffiti because it is viewable to the public and usually the creator is anonymous.  As a result, this form of art can be criticized based on its message and not the creator.  So, the importance of Debord’s arguments are to make us less passive as consumers and more aware of the hold the spectacle has on our everyday lives in the economy, media, commodities, and social relations. 



The Society of the Spectacle’s arguments have convinced me, for I am starting to see more and more how the spectacle is perpetuated through every aspect of modern society.  For example, even childbirth has become a spectacle in some sense.  Ultrasound technology has instructed new mothers to doubt their instinctive motherly senses, as there is less emphasis on what the mother is feeling and more emphasis on visibility to determine the health of a child.  Also, the spectacle has completely taken over sports television.  A hockey game is no longer just a hockey game, but instead a spectacle that features behind the scenes locker room going-ons, commercials that feature rivals preparing for games or that poke fun at the sport, shot competitions at intermissions for fans to win vehicles, and jumbo screens in the arenas so that the fans do not have to watch the actual game but can watch what is going on before their eyes on a screen above them.  

What I still do not completely understand is why isolation is such an imminent factor to the spectacle and economy, mentioned in number 28 of Debord’s book. Is it that the feeling of isolation propels us to purchase more commodities, which further isolate us but give us the ‘appearance’ of belonging?  This and the following are questions for consideration.  Street art has been identified as an opposition to the spectacle, are there any other examples of resistance to the spectacle in modern society?



Supplementary resources:


The film version of the Society of the Spectacle

Background information on Debord and situationism, as well as a critique of Debord’s ideas and death.  

Examples of Situationist Art

Friday, January 14, 2011

1st post

I have officially joined the blogging world!
I’ll start with some introductions and why I have started this blog.  My name is Ashley Van Alstyne and I am currently enrolled in the honours concurrent education program at Lakehead University with a French major.  I plan on teaching at the high school level and my second teachable is the social sciences which is why I have chosen to take a Philosophy class.  This blog is where I will be posting my critical responses for articles that I will read in PHIL2715 a.k.a. philosophy of the Internet.  Here, other class members will also make comments on my article analysis and I will provide further readings/teaching aids and questions to promote discussion.  If I catch the blogging ‘bug’ I may even add the odd random post or thoughts on the internet and technology.  I’ll start with an interesting link I came across on discovery news.  As an aspiring teacher I find it really interesting to think I may have to compete with a robot for a job…http://news.discovery.com/tech/south-korea-schools-get-robot-english-teachers.html